INHALT

2008/806/EC: Commission Decision of 11 March 2008 on a State aid scheme implemented by Italy for the aeronautical industry (C 61/03 (ex NN 42/01)) (notified under document number C(2008) 845) (Text with EEA relevance)

COMMISSION DECISION
of 11 March 2008
on a State aid scheme implemented by Italy for the aeronautical industry (C 61/03 (ex NN 42/01))
(notified under document number C(2008) 845)
(Only the Italian text is authentic)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2008/806/EC)
1. PROCEDURE
2. THE SCHEME APPROVED IN 1986
3. DOUBTS EXPRESSED IN THE FIRST INITIATING DECISION
4. RECIPIENTS
5. ITALYS COMMENTS ON THE DOUBTS EXPRESSED IN THE FIRST INTIATING DECISION
6. COMMENTS ON THE FIRST INITIATING DECISION FROM THIRD PARTIES
6.1. Finmeccanica
6.2. France
6.3. The anonymous third party
7. OBSERVATIONS FROM ITALY REGARDING THE COMMENTS FROM THIRD PARTIES ON THE FIRST INITIATING DECISION
8. FRESH DOUBTS
9. INFORMATION INJUNCTION
10. DOUBTS EXPRESSED IN THE DECISION TO EXTEND PROCEEDINGS (THE SECOND INITIATING DECISION)
11. ITALY'S OBSERVATIONS ON THE SECOND INITIATING DECISION
a) Concerning procedure
b) Development of the scheme
12. COMMENTS BY THE ANONYMOUS THIRD PARTY ON THE SECOND INITIATING DECISION
13. OBSERVATIONS SUBMITTED BY ITALY REGARDING THE ANONYMOUS THIRD PARTYS COMMENTS ON THE SECOND INITIATING DECISION
14. ASSESSMENT
14.1. Existence of aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty and applicable compatibility guidelines
14.2. The subject-matter of the Decision
14.3. The doubts expressed in the first initiating decision
14.4. The doubts expressed in the second initiating decision
14.4.1. The development of the scheme
14.4.2. Nature of the aid instrument
14.4.3. The list of non-notified projects
14.5. Assessment of the final list of civilian projects
a) A109 D/E/F project carried out by Agusta
b) A109 X project carried out by Agusta
c) A119 Koala project carried out by Agusta
d) DO328 project carried out by Aermacchi
e) DO328 Extended Capacity project carried out by Aermacchi
f) DO328 Panels project carried out by Aermacchi
g) ATR72 project carried out by Alenia
h) ATR42-500 project carried out by Alenia
i) MD11 Lower Panels project carried out by Alenia
j) Falcon 2000 project carried out by Alenia
k) MD11 Winglet project carried out by Alenia
l) MD95 project carried out by Alenia
m) Falcon 2000 project carried out by Piaggio
n) GE90 B project carried out by Avio
o) GE90 Growth project carried out by Avio
p) LPT PW308 project carried out by Avio
q) Pressurised Cabins project carried out by Alenia
14.6. Terms of reimbursement
14.7. Conclusion of the assessment of the individual projects
15. THE TWO HELICOPTERS DESCRIBED AS MILITARY HELICOPTERS
16. CONCLUSION
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4