INHALT

Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1698 of 20 February 2014 concerning measures SA.22932 (11/C) (ex NN 37/07) implemented by France in favour of Marseille Provence Airport and airlines using the airport (notified under document C(2014) 870) (Text with EEA relevance)

COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2016/1698
of 20 February 2014
concerning measures SA.22932 (11/C) (ex NN 37/07) implemented by France in favour of Marseille Provence Airport and airlines using the airport
(Only the French text is authentic)
(Text with EEA relevance)
1.
2.
2.1.
2.1.1. MARSEILLE PROVENCE AIRPORT
2.1.2. MARSEILLE-PROVENCE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, CONCESSION-HOLDER FOR MARSEILLE PROVENCE AIRPORT
2.1.3. THE ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF MARSEILLE PROVENCE AIRPORT
2.2.
2.2.1. JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TERMINAL MP2
2.2.2. COMPANIES USING THE NEW TERMINAL MP2
2.3.
2.3.1. INVESTMENT SUBSIDIES FOR THE CCIMP
2.3.2. FINANCIAL FLOWS BETWEEN THE CCIMP AND THE GENERAL ARM OF THE CCI
2.3.3. REDUCED PASSENGER CHARGES FOR USERS OF TERMINAL MP2
2.3.4. REDUCED PASSENGER CHARGES FOR NATIONAL FLIGHTS
2.3.5. REDUCTION OF CERTAIN AIRPORT CHARGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CREATION OF NEW ROUTES
2.3.6. FREE OVERNIGHT PARKING
2.3.7. FINANCING OF MARKETING ACTIVITIES
2.3.8. AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE ADVERTISING SPACE WITH AMS
2.3.9. BUSINESS PLAN FOR TERMINAL MP2 AND APPLICATION OF THE MARKET ECONOMY OPERATOR PRINCIPLE
3.
3.1.
3.1.1. SOME OF THE SUBSIDIES GRANTED ARE SUBJECT TO LIMITATION
3.1.2. SOME OF THE SUBSIDIES GRANTED WERE USED TO FUND NON-ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURES AND DO NOT THEREFORE CONSTITUTE STATE AID
3.1.3. COMPATIBILITY OF THE INVESTMENT SUBSIDIES WITH THE 2005 GUIDELINES
3.1.3.1.
3.1.3.2.
3.1.3.3.
3.1.3.4.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
3.5.
3.6.
3.7.
3.8.
3.9.
4.
4.1.
4.1.1. INVESTMENT SUBSIDIES FOR THE CCIMP
4.1.2. OPERATING SUBSIDIES FOR THE CCIMP
4.1.3. AID GRANTED BY MARSEILLE PROVENCE AIRPORT TO CERTAIN AIRLINES
4.1.3.1.
4.1.3.2.
4.2.
4.2.1. INVESTMENT SUBSIDIES FOR THE CCIMP
4.2.2. SETTING OF THE PASSENGER CHARGES FOR TERMINAL MP2
4.3.
4.3.1. INVESTMENT SUBSIDIES FOR THE CCIMP
4.3.2. OPERATING SUBSIDIES GRANTED TO THE CCIMP
4.3.3. SETTING OF THE PASSENGER CHARGES FOR TERMINAL MP2
4.3.4. INCENTIVE MEASURES FOR THE LAUNCH OF NEW ROUTES
4.3.5. MARKETING AID — AGREEMENT CONCLUDED WITH AMS
4.4.
4.4.1. SUBSIDIES GRANTED TO THE CCIMP
4.4.2. DIFFERENTIATION OF CHARGES AT TERMINAL MP2
4.4.3. START-UP AID
4.5.
5.
6.
6.1.
6.1.1. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND CONCEPT OF UNDERTAKING
6.1.2. STATE RESOURCES AND IMPUTABILITY
6.1.3. SELECTIVE ADVANTAGE FOR THE CCIMP
6.1.4. EFFECT ON COMPETITION AND INTRA-COMMUNITY TRADE
6.1.5. CONCLUSION ON THE EXISTENCE OF AID
6.2.
6.2.1. FINANCIAL FLOWS BETWEEN MARSEILLE PROVENCE AIRPORT AND THE CCI
6.2.2. POTENTIAL AID RESULTING FROM THE AIRPORT TAX SYSTEM
6.3.
6.3.1. COMPATIBILITY OF THE INVESTMENT AID FOR FINANCING TERMINAL MP2
(i) The construction and operation of the infrastructure meet a clearly defined objective of general interest (regional development, accessibility, etc.)
(ii) The infrastructure is necessary and proportional to the objective which has been set
(iii) The infrastructure has satisfactory medium-term prospects for use, in particular as regards the use of existing infrastructure
(iv) All potential users of the infrastructure have access to it in an equal and non-discriminatory manner
(v) The development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the Community interest
(vi) Necessity of the aid
6.3.2. COMPATIBILITY OF THE ERDF SUBSIDY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AIR CARGO
(i) The construction and operation of the infrastructure meet a clearly defined objective of general interest
(ii) The infrastructure is necessary and proportional to the objective which has been set
(iii) The infrastructure has satisfactory medium-term prospects for use, in particular as regards the use of existing infrastructure
(iv) All potential users of the infrastructure have access to it in an equal and non-discriminatory manner
(v) The development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the Community interest
(vi) Necessity of the aid
6.3.3. COMPATIBILITY OF THE DEPARTMENTAL COUNCIL SUBSIDIES OF 27 SEPTEMBER 2002 AND 26 JUNE 2003 AND OF THE MARSEILLE MÉTROPOLE PROVENCE URBAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY OF 26 JULY 2004 FOR THE EXTENSION, RESTRUCTURING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE AIRPORT
(i) The construction and operation of the infrastructure meet a clearly defined objective of general interest (regional development, accessibility, etc.)
(ii) The infrastructure is necessary and proportional to the objective which has been set
(iii) The infrastructure has satisfactory medium-term prospects for use, in particular as regards the use of existing infrastructure
(iv) All potential users of the infrastructure have access to it in an equal and non-discriminatory manner
(v) The development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the Community interest
(vi) Necessity of the aid
7.
7.1.
7.2.
7.2.1. STATE RESOURCES AND IMPUTABILITY
7.2.2. SELECTIVE ADVANTAGE FOR THE AIRLINES OPERATING AT MARSEILLE PROVENCE AIRPORT
7.2.2.1.
7.2.2.2.
7.2.2.3.
7.2.2.4.
7.2.2.5.
7.2.3. Conclusion on the existence of aid
8.
8.1.
8.2.
Article 1
Article 2