Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2327 of 5 July 2016 on State aid SA.19864 — 2014/C ... (32016D2327)
INHALT
Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2327 of 5 July 2016 on State aid SA.19864 — 2014/C (ex 2009/NN54) implemented by Belgium — Public financing of Brussels public IRIS hospitals (notified under document C(2016) 4051) (Text with EEA relevance )
- COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2016/2327
- of 5 July 2016
- on State aid SA.19864 — 2014/C (ex 2009/NN54) implemented by Belgium — Public financing of Brussels public IRIS hospitals
- (notified under document C(2016) 4051)
- (Only the French and Dutch texts are authentic)
- (Text with EEA relevance)
- 1.
- PROCEDURE
- 2.
- BACKGROUND
- 2.1.
- The right to social aid and the Loi CPAS
- 2.2.
- The creation of the IRIS hospitals
- 2.3.
- The regulatory framework applying to the IRIS-H
- 2.4.
- Main activities of the IRIS-H
- 2.5.
- The financing and accounting mechanisms of the IRIS-H
- 2.5.1.
- Financing mechanisms
- 2.5.2.
- Accounting requirements
- 3.
- DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURES TARGETED BY THE COMPLAINT
- 4.
- GROUNDS FOR INITIATING THE PROCEDURE
- 4.1.
- The Commission's 2009 decision
- 4.2.
- The 2012 annulment judgment of the General Court
- 4.3.
- The Commission's opening decision of 1 October 2014
- (116)
- 5.
- COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
- 5.1.
- CBI
- 5.2.
- ABISP
- 5.3.
- Zorgnet Vlaanderen
- 5.4.
- UNCPSY
- 6.
- COMMENTS FROM THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM
- 6.1.
- Comments from Belgium on the opening decision
- 6.2.
- Comments from Belgium on third party comments
- 7.
- ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASURES
- 7.1.
- Scope of this decision
- Figure 1
- Financing flows and scope of this decision
- 7.2.
- State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU
- 7.2.1.
- Selective economic advantage to an undertaking
- 7.2.1.1.
- The notion of undertaking
- 7.2.1.2.
- Economic advantage
- 7.2.1.3.
- Selectivity
- 7.2.2.
- State resources
- 7.2.3.
- Distortion of competition and effect on trade
- 7.2.3.1.
- Distortion of competition
- 7.2.3.2.
- Effect on trade between Member States
- 7.2.4.
- Conclusion
- 7.3.
- Compatibility with the internal market
- 7.3.1.
- Legal basis
- 7.3.1.1.
- General principles
- 7.3.1.2.
- Application of Article 106(2) TFEU over time: preliminary remarks
- 7.3.2.
- Applicability of Article 106(2) TFEU: genuine SGEI
- 7.3.3.
- Applicability of the 2012 SGEI Decision
- 7.3.4.
- The entrustment act
- 7.3.4.1.
- Content and burden of the public service obligations imposed on the IRIS-H
- Figure 2
- Obligations, constraints and public financing mechanisms applicable to the public IRIS hospitals respectively private hospitals
- I. Obligation to treat all patients in all circumstances regardless of their ability to pay (universal care obligation)
- II. Obligation to offer a full range of basic hospital services at multiple sites
- Figure 3
- Map of hospital sites in the Brussels Capital Region
- III. Extensive social services obligation
- IV. Conclusion on the additional obligations
- 7.3.4.2.
- The undertaking entrusted and, where applicable, the territory concerned
- 7.3.4.3.
- Exclusive or special rights
- 7.3.4.4.
- The compensation mechanism
- 7.3.4.5.
- Arrangements in place for avoiding and recovering any overcompensation
- 7.3.4.6.
- Reference to the 2012 SGEI Decision
- 7.3.5.
- Compensation
- 7.3.6.
- Control of overcompensation
- 7.3.7.
- Duration of entrustments
- 7.3.8.
- Transparency
- 7.3.9.
- Summary conclusions on the compatibility with the internal market
- 7.4.
- Final remarks
- 8.
- CONCLUSION
- Article 1
- Article 2
Feedback