2006/367/EC: Commission Decision of 20 October 2004 on the State aid partly imple... (32006D0367)
INHALT
2006/367/EC: Commission Decision of 20 October 2004 on the State aid partly implemented by France for the Sernam company (notified under document number C(2004)3940) (Text with EEA relevance)
- COMMISSION DECISION
- of 20 October 2004
- on the State aid partly implemented by France for the ‘Sernam’ company
- (notified under document number C(2004)3940)
- (Only the French text is authentic)
- (Text with EEA relevance)
- (2006/367/EC)
- 1. PROCEDURE
- 2. DESCRIPTION
- 2.1. Sernam’s structure
- 2.2. Sernam’s activities
- 2.3. Sernam’s market capacity (expert study)
- 2.4. SNCF - Background
- 2.5. Commission Decision of 23 May 2001‘Sernam 1’ - Background
- 2.6. Initiation of the procedure - Background
- 2.7. Subsequent developments
- 3. OBSERVATIONS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
- 4. COMMENTS FROM FRANCE
- 4.1. The lapsing of SNCF’s agreements with Geodis and COGIP
- 4.2. Period of implementation of the plan
- 4.3. €41 million increase in aid
- 4.4. The €67 million expected from Geodis (under the decision of 23 May 2001)
- 4.5. Sernam’s prices
- 4.6. Trend in Sernam's performance
- 4.7. Sernam’s market shares
- 4.8. Drop in turnover
- 4.9. Staff reduction
- 4.10. Closure and reorganisation of sites
- 4.11. Relocation and modernisation of remaining sites
- 4.12. New computer systems
- 4.13. From ‘traditional mail’ to ‘express’
- 4.14. From ‘road’ to ‘rail’ (Train Bloc Express)
- 4.15. Competition in SNCF’s newspaper, baggage and supplies contracts
- 5. SUMMARY OF NEW DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING SERNAM 1
- 6. ASSESSMENT
- 6.1. Existence of aid
- 6.1.1. Public resources
- 6.1.2. Imputability to the State
- 6.1.3. The other criteria of Article 87(1)
- 6.2. Legal basis
- 6.3. Compatibility
- 6.3.1. Structure of the analysis
- 6.3.2. Misuse of aid authorised by the Sernam 1 decision
- 6.3.3. Elements in conformity with the Sernam 1 decision
- 6.3.4. Eligibility for restructuring aid
- 6.3.5. Restoring viability
- 6.3.6. Preventing distortion of competition - Reduction of capacity
- 6.3.7. Preventing distortion of competition – Specific compensatory measures
- 6.3.8. Aid limited to the minimum
- 6.3.9. Implementation and compliance with conditions
- 7. CONCLUSIONS
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 4
- Article 5
- Article 6
Feedback