Commission Decision (EU) 2019/421 of 20 June 2018 on State aid SA.44888 (2016/C) ... (32019D0421)
INHALT
Commission Decision (EU) 2019/421 of 20 June 2018 on State aid SA.44888 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Luxembourg in favour of ENGIE (notified under document C(2018) 3839) (Text with EEA relevance.)
- COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2019/421
- of 20 June 2018
- on State aid SA.44888 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Luxembourg in favour of ENGIE
- (Only the French version is authentic)
- (Text with EEA relevance)
- 1.
- 2.
- 2.1.
- 2.2.
- 2.2.1. INTRODUCTION
- 2.2.2. OVERVIEW OF THE CONTESTED TAX RULING
- 2.2.3. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE LNG TAX RULINGS
- 2.2.3.1.
- 2.2.3.2.
- 2.2.3.3.
- 2.2.3.4.
- 2.2.3.5.
- 2.2.3.6.
- 2.2.3.7.
- 2.2.3.7.1.
- ZORA accretion
- Calculation of the margin
- Minimum margin
- 2.2.3.7.2.
- 2.2.3.7.3.
- 2.2.4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE GSTM TAX RULINGS
- 2.2.4.1.
- 2.2.4.2.
- 2.2.4.3.
- 2.2.4.4.
- 2.2.4.5.
- 2.2.4.6.
- 2.2.4.6.1.
- 2.2.4.6.2.
- 2.2.4.6.3.
- 2.3.
- 2.3.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF THE LUXEMBOURG CORPORATE INCOME TAX SYSTEM
- 2.3.2. THE PARTICIPATION EXEMPTION REGIME AND THE TAXATION OF PROFIT DISTRIBUTIONS
- 2.3.3. TEMPORARY DEFERRAL OF TAXATION OF CAPITAL GAINS ARISING FROM CONVERSIONS
- 2.3.4. ANTI-ABUSE PROVISION
- 3.
- 4.
- 4.1.
- 4.2.
- 4.3.
- 5.
- 5.1.
- 5.2.
- 5.3.
- 6.
- 6.1.
- 6.2.
- 6.2.1. DEROGATION FROM THE LUXEMBOURG CORPORATE INCOME TAX SYSTEM GIVING RISE TO DISCRIMINATION
- 6.2.1.1.
- 6.2.1.2.
- 6.2.2. DEROGATION FROM THE RULES OF THE LUXEMBOURG CORPORATE INCOME TAX SYSTEM CONCERNING THE PARTICIPATION EXEMPTION AND THE TAXATION OF PROFIT DISTRIBUTIONS
- 6.2.2.1.
- 6.2.2.2.
- 6.2.3. LACK OF JUSTIFICATION
- 6.2.4. CONCLUSION ON SELECTIVE ADVANTAGE AT THE LEVEL OF LNG HOLDING AND CEF
- 6.3.
- 6.3.1. REFERENCE SYSTEM
- 6.3.2. COMPARABILITY WITH CORPORATE GROUPS ENGAGING IN INTRAGROUP FINANCING TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN GROUP ENTITIES RESIDENT IN LUXEMBOURG
- 6.3.3. DEROGATION FROM THE REFERENCE FRAMEWORK GIVING RISE TO DISCRIMINATION
- 6.3.4. LACK OF JUSTIFICATION
- 6.3.5. CONCLUSION ON THE SELECTIVE ADVANTAGE AT GROUP LEVEL
- 6.4.
- 6.4.1. CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF ANTI-ABUSE TAX RULES
- 6.4.2. APPLICATION OF THE CONDITIONS TO THE PRESENT CASE
- 6.4.2.1.
- 6.4.2.2.
- 6.4.2.3.
- 6.4.2.4.
- 6.5.
- 6.6.
- 6.7.
- 6.8.
- 7.
- 8.
- 8.1.
- 8.2.
- 8.2.1. LEGAL CERTAINTY AND LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS
- 8.2.1.1.
- 8.2.1.2.
- 8.2.2. PRINCIPLE OF GOOD ADMINISTRATION
- 8.2.3. PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL TREATMENT
- 8.3.
- 8.4.
- 9.
- 10.
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 4
- Article 5
Feedback