Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1671 of 2 August 2019 on State aid SA.47867 2018/C ... (32020D1671)
Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1671 of 2 August 2019 on State aid SA.47867 2018/C (ex 2017/FC) granted by France to Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services (notified under document C(2019) 5729) (Text with EEA relevance)
- COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2020/1671
- of 2 August 2019
- on State aid SA.47867 2018/C (ex 2017/FC) granted by France to Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services
- (notified under document C(2019) 5729)
- (Only the French text is authentic)
- (Text with EEA relevance)
- 1.
- 2.
- 2.1.
- 2.2.
- 3.
- 3.1.
- 3.2.
- 3.3.
- 3.4.
- 4.
- 4.1.
- 4.2.
- 4.3.
- 4.4.
- 4.5.
- 4.6.
- 4.7.
- 4.8.
- 4.9.
- 5.
- 5.1.
- 5.2.
- 5.3.
- 5.4.
- 5.5.
- 5.6.
- 5.7.
- 5.8.
- 6.
- 7.
- 7.1.
- 7.1.1.
- 7.1.2.
- 7.1.2.1.
- (a)
- (b)
- (c)
- (d)
- (e)
- 7.1.2.2.
- 7.1.2.3.
- 7.1.3.
- 7.1.3.1.
- 7.1.3.2.
- 7.1.3.3.
- 7.1.3.4.
- (a)
- (i)
- (1)
- (a) The lack of any real intention on the part of the APFTE to advertise the region is indicated by the circumstances in which it was set up
- (b) The lack of any real intention on the part of the APFTE to advertise the region is indicated by the initial state of its website, which was officially the centre of the promotional campaigns
- (c) The lack of any real intention on the part of the APFTE to advertise the region is indicated by the design of the legal structure that succeeded the APFTE
- (d) Conclusion on the lack of any real intention on the part of the APFTE to advertise the region
- (2)
- (a) The 2010 and 2013 agreements
- (b) The 2017 agreements
- (3)
- (4)
- (5)
- (a) The end of the marketing payments coincided with the cessation of Ryanair’s operations at the airport
- (b) The duration of the marketing campaign aimed at Birmingham coincided with the duration of the Montpellier-Birmingham route
- (6)
- (ii)
- (1)
- (a) The marketing campaigns were limited to Ryanair’s website and customers
- (b) Ryanair’s customers were not the most attractive market segment in terms of economic revenue for the region
- (c) Ryanair’s marketing services had very little impact for the APFTE
- (d) The marketing services actually chosen by the APFTE from among Ryanair’s potential services had even less impact
- (e) The marketing campaigns ignored tourists not targeted by Ryanair’s flight operations
- (2)
- (a) The tangible contribution made by the marketing campaigns to the region is uncertain
- (b) Lack of quantitative evidence of the tangible contribution made by the marketing campaigns
- (c) Existence of
- (iii)
- (iv)
- (b)
- (i)
- (ii)
- (iii)
- 7.1.3.5.
- 7.1.4.
- 7.1.5.
- 7.1.6.
- 7.2.
- 7.3.
- 8.
- 9.
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 4
- Article 5
Feedback