31999D0332

1999/332/EC: Commission Decision of 14 August 1998 on aid granted by Greece to Olympic Airways (notified under document number C(1998) 2423) (Only the Greek text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

Official Journal L 128 , 21/05/1999 P. 0001 - 0024

COMMISSION DECISION

of 14 August 1998

on aid granted by Greece to Olympic Airways

(notified under document number C(1998) 2423)

(Only the Greek text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(1999/332/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 93(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular point (a) of Article 62(1) thereof,

Having given the parties concerned notice(1), in accordance with the provisions of the abovementioned Articles, to submit their comments, and having regard to those comments,

Whereas:

THE FACTS

(1) On 7 October 1994, the Commission adopted Decision 94/696/EC on the aid granted by Greece to Olympic Airways(2) (hereinafter "the initial Decison" according to which the aid granted and to be granted by Greece to Olympic Airways ("OA") is compatible with the common market and the Agreement on the European Economic Area ("the EEA Agreement") by virtue of Article 92(3)(c) of the Treaty and of Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement. The aid comprised:

(a) loan guarantees extended to the company until then pursuant to Article 6 of Greek Law No 96/75 of 26 June 1975;

(b) new loan guarantees totalling USD 378 million for loans to be contracted before 31 December 1997 for the purchase of new aircraft;

(d) conversion of GRD 64 billion of the undertaking's debt to equity;

(e) a capital injection of GRD 54 billion in three instalments of GRD 19, 23 and 12 billion in 1995, 1996 and 1997 respectively.

(2) The last four of these five measures formed part of a restructuring and recapitalisation plan for OA which had initially been submitted to the Commission. On this basis, the Commission considered that the aid would facilitate the development of air-transport activity in a fragmented, peripheral region of the Community, of which it is one of the least developed parts.

(3) The compatibility of the aid was however conditional on compliance by Greece with 21 commitments. These commitments included:

(a) the acceptance that the Commission will, if necessary, have the main results of the plan and the application of the conditions verified by an independent consultant chosen by the Commission in conjunction with the Greek Government (Article 1(g) of the Decision);

(b) the submission by the Greek Government to the Commission each year, at least four weeks before the payment of each instalment of capital increase scheduled in January 1996 and January 1997, of a report on the implementation of the restructuring plan of the company which the Commission could submit for scrutiny by an independent consultant (Article 1(h) of the Decision).

(4) Pursuant to the abovementiond provisions, Greece submitted a report on the implementation of the plan to the Commission on 12 December 1995, prior to the payment of the second instalment of the capital increase of GRD 23 billion scheduled in January 1996. The Commission, with the help of an independent consultant, verified this report and compliance with the conditions.

(5) On the basis of the verification of the report and of compliance with the conditions, and taking into account the position expressed by Greece in a letter of 16 April 1996, the Commission adopted on 30 April 1996 a decision whereby it decided to open the procedure provided for in Article 93(2) of the Treaty with regard to the aids authorised by its initial Decision and with regard to the new and non-notifed aids which it had discovered.

(6) The opening of the procudure with regard to the aids initially authorised was motivated by the breach of several commitments set out in Article 1 of the initial Decision. Hence, the Commission identified shortcomings with regard to the following commitments:

(a) The commitment to refrain from interfering in the management of OA in the future except within the strict limits of its role as shareholder (Article 1(b) of the initial Decision).

The Commission detected several cases of continued and undue interference by the Greek Government in the management of the company:

(i) the government appears to appoint directly the board members of the five subsidiaries of OA although legally this task is incumbent on two representatives of the OA board (hereinafter issue 1);

(ii) the members of OA's board, which are all designated by the State as sole shareholder, appear to have the tendency to interfere constantly and in unexpected ways in the day-to-day management of the company, particularly in the area of staff appointments. The Commission considered that this is notably evidenced by the frequent meetings of the board and the frequent changes of its members (hereinafter issue 2);

(iii) the status of OA resulting from Law No 2271/94, which had been passed in order to implement the restructuring plan of the company was not comparable to that of a private undertaking as regards staff management. Article 4(4) of that Law provides for an express exception to the exemption of OA and its subsidiaries from the application of legislation on public undertakings in so far as they remained subject to Articles 1 to 24 of Law No 2190/94. The Commission considered that these provisions set out a cumbersome administrative recruitment procedure unsuited to personnel management in a company such as OA and that this exception testifies to the persistence of State control in a key element of management of the company (hereinafter issue 3).

In addition, Article 4(2) of Law No 2271/94 also provides that working regulations of OA employees "shall be approved by Presidential Decree on a proposal from the Minister for Transport and Communications, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 8(3) of Law No 2224/94". There is uncertainty as to whether this procedure is to apply beyond 31 January 1995. The same Article of Law No 2271/94 also explicitly provides that the agreements concluded in December 1994 between OA and representatives of the cabin crew on working conditions and any future agreement on the same matters are likewise to be approved by Presidential Decree on a proposal from the Ministry of Transport and Communications. Article 8(3) of Law No 2224/94, however, which constitutes the ordinary law applicable to undertakings in Greece, provides that the working regulations for the staff of undertakings are jointly approved by the social partners without any interference from the State, and then communicated to the Ministry of Labour (hereinafter issue 4).

Finally, there is uncertainty as to the exact scope of the abovementioned Article 4(4) of Law No 2271/94, as Greek Law No 2366/95 - adopted after Law No 2271/94 in December 1995 - appears to provide for specific regimes for OA staff, thus casting doubts on whether OA enjoys the same autonomy vis-à-vis the Greek Government from a legal point of view as a public limited company (hereinafter issue 5);

(iv) Law No 2271/94 in iteself constitutes an interference in the business, in that it determines the voluntary retirement conditions of OA personnel and the working conditions within the company. With effect from the notification of the initial Decision to the Greek authorities, OA should be governed only by ordinary Greek law, supplemented, where appropriate, by internal company agreements, particularly as regards labour law and social security. This non-compliance with the Decision is clear and in the case of the voluntary departure payments, which, in application of Article 2(4) of Law No 2271/94 exceed the payment normally due by, on the one hand, 25 % and, on the other hand, a sum corresponding to two months' salary (hereinafter issue 6);

(v) OA still does not appear to have complete freedom to define and organise its network. Olympic Aviation, the domestic subsidiary, is obliged to operate on six to seven small, unprofitable routes between the Greek mainland and the Greek islands for which public service obligations have not been imposed in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes(3) (hereinafter issue 7);

(vi) OA transports the Greek press at extremely low fares compared with the costs incurred by this activity. Although the Government does not formally impose this obligation on OA (which cost is estimated at GRD 1,5 billion per annum), the Commission considered that such an abnormal situation would not be perpetuated by a truly autonomous management (hereinafter issue 8);

(vii) the Government and the Greek Civil Aviation Authority have so far refrained from paying for tickets issued by OA on behalf of their officials, agents and political staff. The debt in question amounts to several billion Greek drachmas. The Commission considered that the non-payment of this debt points to a continuing relationship of dependence between the Greek State and its national airline (hereinafter issue 9).

(b) The commitment to give OA the fiscal status of a public limited company comparable to that of Greek companies under ordinary law, except for exempting it from any taxes likely to affect the recapitalisation operation provided for in Article 1(c) of the initial Decision (Article 1(c) of the initial Decision).

(i) Article 1(1) of Law No 2271/94 provides that "the profits for financial years 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997 of OA and Olympic Aviation SA shall be exempted from any form of public tax or levy to the extent that they result essentially in the reorganisation of the structure of their balance sheet in conformity with the approved recovery plan, on condition that these profits are made available for the capital restructuring and reorganisation of the company". This provision goes far beyond the exemption authorised by Article 1(c) of the initial Decision. Given that the conversion to equity of GRD 64 billion of the company's debt and the various captial injections totalling GRD 54 billion have no direct impact on the taxation of enterprises, the exemption in question applies solely to the tax on the exceptional profit resulting, for 1994 alone, from the cancellation of OA's debt totalling GRD 427 billion. Consequently, the Commission considered that the very general scope of the exemption provided for in Article 1(1) of Law No 2271/94 means that OA cannot be regarded as having the fiscal status of a public limited company comparable to that of Greek undertakings under ordinary law for the years 1995, 1996 and 1997 (hereinafter issue 10).

(ii) The same applies to the exemption provided for in Article 1(j) of Law No 2271/94, which states that "OA shall be exempted from any commission, tax or levy to be paid to the State or to third parties and shall be relieved of any additional charge" resulting from the granting of loan guarantees by Greece and the instalments of the capital injection (issue 9). The exemption authorised by Article 1(c) of the initial Decision applies solely to taxes and not to all charges likely to affect the company, and it concerns exclusively the recapitalisation operations and not the grant of State guarantees (hereinafter issue 11).

(c) The commitment to bring the agreements between the Greek State and OA into line with the provisions of the third package of liberalisation measures(4) by 31 December 1994 (Article 1(d) of the Decision):

(i) The presidential Decree terminating the preferential rights of OA to operate the domestic mainland services in Greece as from 31 December 1995 has still not come into force. The Commission considered that the continuation in force of national legislation which conflicts with Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 constitutes a failure by Greece to comply with the abovementioned commitment (hereinafter issue 12).

(ii) It also appears that the Greek State has not yet terminated OA's exclusive right to operate domestic scheduled flights within continental Greece which were not operated before 1 January 1993 or which have not been operated by it since that date, in particular those of a seasonal nature. The Commission considers that this would amount to a failure to comply with the abovementioned commitment as well as with the commitment provided by Article 1(u) of the initial Decision which states that the Greek Government does not maintain, in conformity with Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 any exclusive concession to the benefit of OA on domestic scheduled flights within continental Greece which were not operated before 1 January 1993 or which have not been operated continuously by OA since that date (hereinafter issue 13).

(d) The commitment not to grant any further aid to OA in any form whatsoever, in conformity with Community law (Article 1(e) of the initial Decision).

(i) Article 2(12)(a) of Law No 2271/94 provides that: "the purchase cost for military service and the years of previous service provided for in paragraph 2 and the payments provided for in paragraph 4 and subparagraph (b) of paragraph 7 of this Article shall be borne by the State budget up to an amount of GRD 11 billion". The Commission considered that this amount constitutes aid since the State is assuming direct responsibility for costs that should normally be borne by OA. Such aid affects trade between Member States and distorts competition in view of the international dimension of air transport and the fact that the benefit is reserved to OA alone. It therefore constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the Treaty and Article 61(1) of the Agreement (hereinafter issue 14).

(ii) As indicated above, OA is exempt from any form of public tax or public levy for the years 1995, 1996 and 1997. It is also exempt from all taxes and other expenses in respect of the loan guarantees. The Commission considered that these measures, specific to OA, also constitute new Sate aid since, as has been explained previously, they were in no way provided for in Article 1(c) of the initial Decision (hereinafter issue 15).

(iii) Finally, OA has not paid landing and parking fees at Greek airports since the initial Decision was notified to Greece. Although the company is not formally exempt and these unpaid fees are shown as debts in the company's liabilities, the exemption of such fees for OA which derives from Article 5(1) and (2) of Greek Decree No DII/35502/15316 of 16 September 1994 has not been formally repealed (hereinafter issue 16).

(e) The commitment to accept the principle that airlines other than OA are authorised to operate routes between Greece and countries not belonging to the EEA and to make designations or multiple designations solely on the basis of the merits of each request (Article 1(o) of the initial Decision):

The presidential Decree terminating OA's exclusive right to operate scheduled international flights (passenger, freight, mail) under the Greek flag between Greece and countries not belonging to the EEA has still not entered into force. This is the same decree as that abolishing OA's preferential right on domestic Greek routes (mentioned in point (c)(i)). The Commission considered that this delay since the notification of the initial Decision constitutes a breach of the above commitment (hereinafter issue 17).

(7) In the light of the above, the Commission considered that although OA seemed to make a very satisfactory recovery in conformity with the plan on which the initial Decision was based, the Greek Government's failure to comply with several of the commitments, adherence to which was a condition of its authorisation of the aid, cast doubts on the continuous compatibility of this aid with Article 92 of the Treaty and Article 61 of the EEA Agreement. These new circumstances disturbed the balance struck in the initial Decision. Therefore, the authorisation of the aid was compromised. In this context, the Commission considered that it had to re-examine the aid in order to adopt a new and, if necessary, different Decision from that taken on 7 October 1994.

(8) The opening of the procedure was also prompted by serious doubts regarding the compatibility with Article 92 of the Treaty and Article 61 of the EEA Agreement of the new and non-notified aids it had discovered, namely that the Greek State had assumed responsibility for a sum of GRD 11 billion, tax exemptions for the period 1995 to 1997 and for loan guarantees, exemption from non-fiscal expenses likely to affect capital injections and possible exemptions from landing and parking fees.

(9) By letter of 31 May 1996, the Commission notified Greece of its decision to open the procedure provided for in Article 93(2) of the Treaty and gave it formal notice to submit its comments. By this letter, the Commission also reminded Greece that in accordance with Article 93(3) of the Treaty, no aid measure may be put into effect until the abovementioned procedure has resulted in a final decision. On this basis, the remaining capital injections of GRD 23 billion and GRD 12 billion could not be carried out and the remaining State guarantees for USD 378 million could not be granted. This letter was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities(5) and the other Member States and interested parties were also requested to submit their comments.

III

(10) By letter of 1 July 1996, Greece submitted its comments in reply to the Commission's letter of 31 May 1996 informing it of the decision to open the procedure.

(11) First, Greece asserted that notwithstanding the opening of the procedure with regard to the aids initially authorised in 1994, Greece was entitled to carry out the capital injections planned for 1995, 1996 and 1997. Article 1(i) of the initial Decision provides that Greece is committed not to carry out these capital injections only where the objectives of the restructuring plan have not been attained; it does not mention the failure to comply with the commitments.

(12) Secondly, Greece made detailed comments on the issues involved by adherence to the commitments.

(13) Following the opening of the procedure, the United Kingdom and Danish Governments and interested parties including British Airways, Lufthansa, SAS, Olympic Airways, IACA (International Air Carrier Association), ACE (European Community Air Carrier Association), ADL (German Charter Carrier Association) submitted their comments on this case. With the exception of the comments submitted by OA, all the comments received approved the Commission's decision to open the procedure provided for in Article 93(2) of the Treaty and raised a number of questions relating to the doubts expressed in that decision.

(14) In their observations, the States which commented pointed out that the Treaty rules on State aid must be strictly applied in the context of increased competition within the common air transport market, following the entry into force of the third package of liberalisation measures on 1 January 1993. On this basis, compliance with commitments which condition the compatibility of an aid with the common market must be effectively ensured. The procedure needs to be opened when these commitments are not adhered to by a Member State, as has occurred here, where the compromise reached in the Commission Decision of 7 October 1994 has been breached. In particular, the commitment not to give any further aid is a very important condition. The United Kingdom Government added that, if Greece had effectively not honoured the commitments, the aids originally authorised should be recovered. The Danish Government for its part insisted on the fact that the new aid measures cannot be exempted since they cannot meet the requirements of the Market Economy Investor Principle and since, in any case, there is no exceptional circumstance unforeseeable and external to OA which could possibly justify these new aid measures.

(15) These points also appear, to various degrees, in the observation of the interested third parties who also make additional points concerning the failure of Greece to comply with the commitments.

(16) With the exception of OA, all interested parties denounced the monopoly of Olympic Airways on third-party handling services at Greek airports, which results in a poor quality of service and high prices. In addition, they claimed that OA provides a far better service for its own flights as compared to the service it provides to its competitors, thus clearly discriminating against them. SAS requested the immediate liberalisation of ground-handling services in Greece in order to restore the balance of the initial Commission Decision.

(17) Some of the interested parties indicated that, contrary to the confirmation given by Greece in the initial Decision, self-handling is not in practice fully liberalised in Greece. Lufthansa indicated that no response has been given since January 1996 by the Greek Civil Aviation Authority to its application for a self-handling licence at Athens-Hellenikon airport. British Airways mentioned its continuous difficulties in effectively self-handling its flights.

(18) Lufthansa further indicated that the aid received by OA distorts competition on the routes between Germany and Greece as OA decreased its fares on these routes.

(19) ACE called for the discontinuation of the exemption of the Greek islands from the application of the third package in order to safeguard the balance of the initial Commission Decision.

(20) ADL indicated that charter flights operated by Community air carriers between other Member States and the Greek islands remain subject to important constraints by virtue of a Greek Regulation of 1 March 1996. Hence, those carriers cannot sell one-way tickets, nor can they transport freight apart from agricultural products and press publications. ADL further stressed that these restrictions were not applied to OA. It also requested the application of the third package to the Greek islands.

(21) OA made comments similar to those submitted by Greece.

(22) All the comments were communicated to Greece by letter of 30 July 1996.

(23) The comments of the interested parties raised two additional issues which further impaired the balance of the initial Decision:

(a) The restictions laid down by the Greek Regulation of 1 March 1996 with regard to the operation of non-scheduled air services to the Greek islands are incompatible with the commitment of Greece to comply with the definition of non-scheduled air services as it may be inferred from the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92; in particular not to impose on non-scheduled services any constraint such as the prohibition of "seat only" provision on return journeys, prohibition of the transport of cargo or mail and the requirement of a minimum sojourn time (Article 1(r) of the initial Commission Decision). Moreover, the Commission was concerned by the fact that those restrictions would not apply to OA, which would then benefit from a preferential regime involving a discrimination (hereinafter issue 18).

(b) Although Article 1 of the initial Decision does not include a specific commitment on the part of Greece as to self-handling at Greek airports, the initial Decision states that "the Commission takes note of the Greek authorities' assurances that all aspects of self-handling are authorised at those airports" as an alternative to the poor quality of service offered by OA in the framework of its monopoly for third-party handling services. This assurance had been taken into account by the Commission in the course of its assessment of the compatibility of the aid.

The practical difficulties or even the impossibility for several Community air carriers to self-handle their flights at Greek airports led the Commission to consider that, in practice, self-handling was not fully authorised at Greek airports. This was further evidenced by information transmitted to the Commission by the Association of Greek airlines on 11 June 1996 according to which no reply had been given so far by the Greek Civil Aviation Authority to the applications for self-handling lodged in December 1995 by Venus Airlines for Kos, Cronus Airlines for Thessalonica and KAL for Heraklion and Rhodes (hereinafter issue 19).

(24) By letters of 4 July 1996 and 7 August 1996, the Commission drew the attention of Greece to these new issues and requested information thereon.

(25) In addition, following a closer examination of the status of OA under Greek law with the help of a specialised lawyer, the Commission also identified an additional breach of the commitment of Greece not to grant any further aid to OA in any form whatsoever (Article 1(e) of the initial Commission Decision). Article 2.4 of Law No 2271/94 provides that the redundancy indemnities given to OA employees accepting early retirement in accordance with the conditions set out by the same provision is not subject to ordinary income taxation but to a preferential income taxation. This preferential regime constitutes an incentive to employees to leave the company and therefore allows OA to secure the redundancy objective set out by the restructuring plan. On this basis, it constitutes an aid since the State is de facto assuming direct responsibility for costs which would otherwise need to be borne by OA in order to reach the same objective. This aid affects trade between Member States and distorts competition in view of the international dimension of air transport and the fact that the benefit is reserved to OA alone. It therefore constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the Treaty and Article 61 of the EEA Agreement (hereinafter issue 16a).

(26) Finally, the study of the status of OA also revealed that the unpaid debt of the Greek State to OA consisted not only of unpaid services to the Greek Civil Aviation Authority but also of services to various other State entities, inlcuding ministries, Government agencies and public undertakings. Apart from the State debt, the Greek political parties had also accumulated substantial debts towards OA (see issue 9 above).

(27) The Commission sent to Greece on 4 December 1996 a letter requesting information on all the issues concerning a breach of the commitments as identified in the Commission Decision of 30 April 1996 opening the procedure as well as on the abovementioned new issues.

(28) Continued contacts and exchanges of information took place between the Commission and Greece in 1997.

(29) On 13 June 1997, the Commission indicated to the representatives of the Greek Government that, given the time that had elapsed since its Decision to open the procedure (14 months) and given the fact that the restructuring plan on which the initial Decision was based ended in 1997, the Commission needed a confirmation that the objectives of the plan had been achieved by OA and that the company's return to viability was secured. Greece indicated that a report on this matter would be submitted to the Commission.

(30) Accordingly, on 20 August 1997, Greece submitted to the Commission a report concerning the financial performance of OA for the period 1995 to 1997 and including financial projections up to 2001. In conformity with Article 1(g) of the initial Decision, the Commission appointed, in conjunction with Greece, an independent consultant (Deloitte & Touche) to assess the implementation of the plan and progress made. The consultant's report was submitted on 10 November 1997. The report was based on OA's audited accounts for 1996 and provisional accounts for 1997.

(31) It emerged from the report that, although OA had continued to make efforts to maintain its return to viability, it had not met the objectives of the restructuring plan.

(32) First, although net profits had continued increasing since 1995, they had increased at a slower rate than planned (from GRD 9,9 billion in 1995 to a projected GRD 14,6 billion for 1997, whereas the plan had provided for an increase from GRD 13,9 billion in 1995 to GRD 29,6 billion in 1997). OA had been negatively affected by higher than expected exchange rates on the US dollar. However, the effects of this situation were largely counterbalanced by higher than expected growth of the markets on which OA was active (5,5 % against 3 % originally forecast) and accounting adjustments. A more detailed analysis revealed that the air-transport business of OA was actually still making losses and that without the contribution of ground-handling activities which continued to generate important revenues because of the monopoly held by OA (GRD 40,9 billion in 1996, projected at 40 billion in 1997), the company would be making losses.

(33) Secondly, some restructuring measures provided by the plan had not been fully implemented or had not produced the expected results. This was the case in particular for personnel reductions and the change of working regulations, the reorganisation of the structure of the company, the setting-up of a reliable and comprehensive management information system and to a lesser extent for the reorganisation of the network. As a result, OA had failed to meet the operational objectives of the plan. Personnel costs remained of high concern, as they had increased far beyond projections. Personnel costs increased substantially between 1995 and 1996 despite reductions in the number of employees. Moreover, personnel productivity was also an area of concern as it remained substantially below other Community carriers belonging to the Association of European Air carriers (AEA).

(34) Therefore, although OA remained viable for the time being, it was clear that, in the context of the imminent liberalisation of ground-handling activities in the Community (which became effective with Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 on access to the ground-handling market at Community airports(6)), its long-term viability could be achieved only if the company could secure the profitability of its air-transport business. This was not the case, as OA was still lacking a real competitive structure in terms of adequation between costs (in particular labour costs) and revenues. Moreover, there were serious concerns as to its ability to face the important investments involved by its fleet renewal and its move to the new Athens airport at Spata. These two issues clearly constituted important medium-term challenges for the viability of OA. Finally, the company also had to take into account the constraint involved by the fact that the last two imstalments of the capital injection initially scheduled for payment in January 1996 and January 1997 and the Sate guarantees worth GRD 378 billion remained blocked for the time being as a result of the opening of the procedure.

(35) On this basis, it was clear that OA needed, on the one hand, to fully implement those restructuring measures for which actions had not been taken and, on the other, to update the plan and provide for additional restructuring measures. These additional measures were necessary to take into account the present financial position of OA and the financial consequences of the abovementioned challenges and constraint faced by the company.

(36) On 21 November 1997, the Commission presented the results of these findings to the management of OA. The management of OA broadly accepted these findings and indicated that the restructuring plan was in the process of being updated on the basis of a report prepared by a firm of financial consultants appointed by OA (McKinsey).

(37) However, in December 1997 the Greek Government decided to replace the management team of OA. A new management team effectively came into office in January 1998 and started designing the revised restructuring plan. This revised plan was to be based on new working regulations to be agreed between the company and the 17 unions representing the employees. It was expected that Greece would submit the revised plan to the Commission in April 1998.

(38) Following a negative reaction by the unions which rejected the proposed new working regulations, OA was unable to finalise the revised restructuring plan as envisaged. At the end of March 1998, the company underwent a severe internal crisis which caused substantial disruption to its operations. At the same time, it appeared that the company was facing serious liquidity problems as it had to make advance payments for the aircraft ordered for the renewal of the fleet without having arranged for their financing, because no State guarantees were available. The internal crisis was finally halted when the Greek Government, in accordance with Greek law, decided to impose the working regulations proposed by OA by way of Law No 2602/98 adopted by the Greek Parliament on 9 April 1998.

(39) Contacts between the Commission, Greece and OA as well as exchanges of information on all the issues involved in the case (including the revision of the restructuring plan) have continued since February 1998. These contacts included meetings in Athens and Brussels on 19 February 1998, 16 March 1998, 30 April 1998, 5, 9, 22 and 29 June 1998.

(40) By two letters of 3 and 6 July 1998, Greece submitted to the Commission a revised restructuring programme for OA and additional information on compliance with the commitments and the additional issues identified by the Commission in its letter of 4 December 1996.

(41) On the basis of all the information transmitted by Greece following the opening of the procedure, notably by letters of 28 May 1998, 3 and 6 July 1998 and by hand on the occasion of various meetings, the situation concerning first the commitments and the additional issues identified by the Commission and secondly the revised restructuring plan is as follows.

Commitments and the additional issues identified by the Commission

(42) As to the commitments set out in Article 1 of the initial Decision:

(a) On the commitment to refrain from interfering in the management of OA except within the strict limits of the role of the Greek Government as shareholder (Article 1(b) of the initial Decision):

(i) With regard to the appointment of the board members of OA subsidiaries, the Commission received formal assurances from the Greek authorities that this issue is a matter exclusively reserved to OA's management (issue 1).

(ii) With regard to the constant interference of the board of OA in day-to-day management of the company (issue 2), the Commission received formal assurances from Greece that, in accordance with Greek law, the board's mission remains limited to the general formulation of the company's policy.

(iii) With regard to the cumbersome administrative recruitment procedure provided by Articles 1 to 24 of Law No 2190/94 (issue 3), the Commission was supplied with Greek Law No 2527/97, which provides for a specific sui generis recruitment procedure for OA seasonal staff. Accordingly, OA can directly contract seasonal staff from a reserve list without any additonal procedure.

(iv) With regard to the approval of the working regulations applicable to OA staff by Presidential Decree (issue 4), Greece formally confirmed to the Commission that this procedure was only applied once in the framework of Law No 2271/94 and that since 31 January 1995, the ordinary arrangements under Greek labour law had applied. The Greek authorities further indicated that, in any case, it is common practice for the social partners to receive formal endorsement of their agreements on working regulations by the State through a legislative provision.

(v) With regard to the specific arrangements set out by Law No 2366/95 for OA (issue 5) and the fact that Law No 2271/94 determined the working conditions for OA and the conditions for voluntary retirement (issue 6), this procedure was necessary in order to implement the changes brought about by the restructuring programme of OA. The corresponding provisions of Law No 2271/94 were in fact an essential element of the plan.

(vi) With regard to the freedom of OA to define and organise its network (issue 7), Greece indicated that it was not imposing on OA the obligation to operate six to seven small domestic routes. This was further confirmed by OA itself, which indicated that it is entirely free to decide which routes it wants to operate. In this connection, the company indicated that the reorganisation of its network is part of the follow up of its restructuring and takes place on the basis of commercial considerations.

(vii) With regard to the conditions for the transport of press publications (issue 8), OA has applied new increased tariffs since 1 June 1998. These tariffs are based on the prevailing IATA rules.

(viii) With regard to the settlement of the respective debts of the Greek State and OA (issue 9), the Greek authorities gave the following information and assurances:

- On the basis of a formal agreement between the Greek Civil Aviation Authority and OA, all services provided by OA to the Greek Civil Aviation Authority are provided in accordance with OA's normal commercial and pricing policy. The compensation of the respective debts of OA and the Greek Civil Aviation Authority to each other has been carried out. On this basis, OA owes GRD 1,29 billion to the Greek Civil Aviation Authority (mainly past unpaid landing and parking fees). This amount will be paid before 31 December 1998. An amount of GRD 375 million of debt is currently owed by the Greek Civil Aviation Authority to OA. The Greek courts will settle this matter.

- Since January 1995, the issuing of tickets for travel by Greek Government officials on mission is conducted under normal commercial and pricing terms.

- All State entities have started to pay back their debts to OA. Central Government agencies have already paid GRD 5,78 billion and an estimated GRD 2,63 billion will be paid upon confirmation of the amounts involved. Social security funds and other State entities have already paid GRD 228 million and an estimated GRD 1,22 billion will be paid upon confirmation of the amounts involved. Should these entities not be in a financial position to pay their remaining debts for budget reasons, the State will secure the corresponding payments to OA. In any case, all State debts will be paid before 31 December 1998.

- The debts of private entities which are placed under the supervision of public entities and of public companies will be claimed by OA before the Greek courts in accordance with normal procedures.

- The debts of the political parties to OA, amounting to GRD 1,64 billion, will be paid in accordance with the provisions of Law No 2602/98 which provides for their payment no later than 31 December 1999. For this purpose, the amounts concerned will be deducted from State funding made available to the political parties.

(b) On the commitment to give OA the fiscal status of a public limited company comparable to that of Greek companies under ordinary law (Article 1(c) of the initial Decision):

- With regard to the scope of the tax exemption referred to in Article 1(1) of Law No 2271/94 (issue 10), Greece gave written confirmation to the Commission that this provision applies only to the tax on exceptional profit resulting, for 1994, from the cancellation of OA's debt totalling GRD 427 billion.

- With regard to the scope of tax exemption referred to in Article 1(j) of Law No 2271/94 (issue 11), Greece confirmed that this provision was only applied for taxes concerning the recapitalisation of OA and not to other forms of charges nor to taxes concerning the State guarantees.

(c) On the commitment to bring the agreements between the Greek Government and OA into line with the provisions of the third package by 31 December 1994 (Article 1(d) of the Decision):

With regard to the entry into force of the Presidential Decree terminating the preferential rights of OA to operate mainland services (issue 12) and the termination of the exclusive right of OA to operate mainland domestic scheduled services which were not operated before 1 January 1993 or which have not been operated by it since that date (issue 13), the Greek authorities referred to Presidential Decree No 359 of 13 September 1996 which entered into force on 19 September 1996. This Presidential Decree formally terminates all preferential and/or exclusive rights of OA for the operation of both mainland domestic services in Greece and services between Greece and non-EEA countries.

(d) On the commitment not to grant any further aid to OA in any form whatsoever, in conformity with Community law (Article 1(e) of the initial Decision):

(i) With regard to the aids involved in the GRD 11 billion mentioned in Article 2(12)(a) of Law No 2271/94 (issue 14) and by the preferential tax treatment of the redundancy indemnities granted to OA employees as provided by Article 2.4 of Law 2271/94 (issue 16a). Greece indicated that the cost of the preferential tax treatment was estimated at GRD 2,2 billion. Greece also informed the Commission by letter of 6 July 1998 that, taking into consideration the fact that the Commission considered that these measures involved new aids to OA, it was willing to reduce the amount of the remaining part of the capital injection to be carried out in accordance with the restructuring plan as approved by the Commission in 1994 by GRD 13,2 billion.

(ii) With regard to the aid involved by Article 1(1) and (j) of Law No 2271/94 (issue 15), Greece referred to the fact that the exact scope of the tax and levy exemptions had been clarified and did not involve any other aid than that expressly authorised by the initial Decision.

(iii) With regard to the aid involved by the continuation of the exemption of OA from the payment of parking and landing fees at Greek airports after the notification of the initial Decision (issue 16), Greece referred to the Presidential Decree No 138/97 of 13 June 1997, whereby the exemption enjoyed by OA in this regard by virtue of Greek Decree No DII/35502/15316 was formally abrogated. It also referred to the fact that the amount of unpaid charges owed by OA to the Greek Civil Aviation Authority since 1 Janaury 1995 will be compensated with the debts owed by the Greek Civil Aviation Authority to OA (see issue 9).

(e) On the commitment to accept the principle that airlines other than OA are authorised to operate routes between Greece and countries not belonging to the EEA and to make designations or multiple designations solely on the basis of the merits of each request (Article 1(o) of the Decision):

With regard to the entry into force of the Decree abrogating the exclusive rights enjoyed by OA in this regard (issue 17), Greece referred to the abovementioned Presidential Decreee No 359 of 13 September 1996 which entered into force on 19 September 1996. This Presidential Decree terminated all exclusive rights held by OA for the operation of services between Greece and non-EEA countries.

(f) On the commitment to accept the indirect definition of non-scheduled air services as indicated in the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, in particular not to impose any constraint on non-scheduled services (Article 1(r) of the initial Decision):

With regard to the abolition of existing restictions for the provision of non-scheduled services to the Greek islands (issue 18), Greece referred to the Greek Regulation No D1/A/51328/2680 of 17 December 1997, which removes the operational constraint initially provided for the transport of freight by the Greek Regulation of 1 March 1996 and fully applies to all Community air carriers, including OA.

(43) As regards the issue of self-handling (issue 19), Grece referred to the modification of the Greek Regulation for the procedure for the granting of self-handling licences which was adopted on 4 November 1997. Accordingly, the Greek Civil Aviation Authority is now under the obligation to respond to any application within two months. In the absence of any response, the approval of the application is automatic and the Greek Civil Aviation Authority is therefore under an obligation to grant the licence.

(44) Moreover, Greece informed the Comission that Cronus Airlines had been granted a self-handling licence for the airports of Thessaloniki, Athens and Heraklion. The application of Venus Airlines for Kos did not need to be further considered as the company had ceased ground-handling operations. The pending applications of KAL, Air Greece and Avionic for the airports of Heraklion, Rhodes, Mtilini, Santorini and Thessaloniki, which were initially refused, are presently under re-examination. With regard to the application lodged by Lufthansa, Greece indicated that this application is being examined and that, in this framework and in accordance with the applicable procedure, a request has been made to the company for an audit of its personnel and equipment.

(45) Finally, Greece indicated to the Commission that Directive 96/67/EC on access to the ground-handling market at Community airports is in the final stage of implementation and that those airports which do not fall within the scope of the Directive will remain covered by the present arrangements applicable in Greece. According to those arrangements, self-handling is fully authorised. Licences can only be refused on the basis of objective space and capacity constraints or on the basis of safety and security considerations.

Revised restructuring plan

(46) The revised restructuring plan submitted by Greece to the Commission covers the period 1998 to 2002. It takes into account the final results of OA for 1997 and preliminary results for the first months of 1998. These results show that the position of OA has further deteriorated as compared with the results set out by the report submitted by Greece on 20 August 1997. While this report had projected net profits in the order of GRD 14,6 billion for 1997 (against GRD 19,6 billion projected by the restructuring plan), OA has acutally posted a net loss of GRD 6,8 billion. This loss of profitability directly stemmed from an extraordinary salary increase granted in order to resolve personnel conflicts. This increase resulted in a 19 % labour cost rise over 1996 (+ GRD 25 billion).

(47) The revised restructuring does not provide for any aids other than those authorised by the initial Decision. However, in order to reflect the reduction of the remaining amount of the capital increase not yet granted to OA to counterbalance the GRD 13,2 billion of new aid (see issues 15 and 16a), the revised plan only provides for a capital increase of GRD 21,8 billion instead of the initially planned amount of GRD 35 billion.

(48) The revised plan aims at ensuring the long-term viability of the company by the full implementation of the restructuring measures provided by the initial plan and by the implementation of additional restructuring measures. These measures concentrate on two objectives:

(a) The reorganisation of the cost structure of the company:

The plan is primarily based on the new working regulations included in Law No 2606/98 of 9 April 1998 which provided for new working conditions based upon the recommendations of a report produced by McKinsey. These include:

(i) General salary freeze for the period 1998 to 2000 and limited convergence salary increases for the period 2001 to 2002.

(ii) Introduction of working time conditions for crew members in line with international standards.

(iii) A reduction of jobs (approximately 1000) and hierachy levels (from eight to four).

(iv) Discontinuation of various allowances granted to specifc categories of personnel.

(v) Overtime decrease, introduction of a flexible timetable adapted to the operational needs of the company, merging of positions (all for ground staff).

(vi) Reduction of staff by 1300 through natural wastage and reduction of seasonal staff by 30 %.

These measures will allow OA to reduce operating costs. Their implementation has already started.

(b) The improvement of the yields:

Apart from the new working conditions which will impact positively on the productivity of the company and thus on the yields, the plan provides for the following measures:

(i) Product improvement and redesign, together with the implementation of a new marketing policy.

(ii) Redimensioning of the network by increasing frequencies and building hub-type operations at Athens. Frequencies on the potentially most profitable routes will be increased and timetables reset. The operation of non-profitable routes will be discontinued.

(iii) The entry into the fleet of new aircraft better suited to the operational needs of OA and more cost-effective. The number of aircraft in the fleet will increase from 35 in early 1998 to 40 in 2002.

On this basis, OA's yields are expected to catch up with levels to be achieved by other Southern European air carriers whose markets are, although to a lesser extent than OA, also influenced by seasonal leisure traffic.

(49) The plan also provides for company-wide reorganisation.

(a) The role of all non-core business activities will be redefined and gradually transformed into autonomous subsidiary companies in order to achieve better results. In the mean time, business plans for the maintenance department, ground-handling department and cargo operations will be developed.

(b) Charter activities will be developed through a special, purpose-made company: Macedonian Airlines.

(50) The plan is based on a major investment plan to be carried out without new capital to be drawn from the shareholder. These investments comprise:

(a) The acquisition of 12 new aircraft replacing older ones for a total cost of USD 980 million:

- Two A340s will join the fleet in September and October 1998 while two others will join the fleet in 1999. They will replace the four B747s which will leave the fleet (to be sold by 2000). An additional A340 could join the fleet subject to operational requirements during the restructuring period.

- Eight B737s will join the fleet in 2000.

(b) The move to the new Athens airport at Spata in 2001 for an estimated cost of GRD 75 billion, of which approximately GRD 35 billion is expected to be financed by the compensation granted by the Greek State for the loss of facilities at the existing Hellenikon airport which will be closed upon entry into service of Spata.

(51) The main indicators and ratios of the financial projections are as follows:

>TABLE>

(52) The above figures are based in particular on the assumption that aviation revenues will increase by 25 % over the duration of the plan (from GRD 269 billion in 1998 to GRD 337,6 billion in 2002) while ground-handling revenues will decrease by 28,2 % (from GRD 46,5 billion in 1998 to GRD 33,3 billion in 2002) as a result of the liberalisation of this activity. The operating result is expected to increase to GRD 21,2 billion in 1999. It will then decrease to GRD 1,6 billion in 2001 and stabilise at GRD 8,4 billion in 2002 as a result of the major investments to be made by OA for its move to Spata and the fleet renewal (accrued financial and operating leases expenses, interest expenses and depreciation costs). Profits before tax will therefore follow the same trend, while remaining positive throughout the duration of the revised plan.

(53) The revised plan is supplemented by an implementation plan setting out the timing for the various measures, implementation costs and the timing and amounts of the planned benefits.

(54) In agreement with the Greek authorities, the Commission appointed the consultant who verified the report submitted by the Greek authorities on 20 August 1997 to analyse the soundness of the revised restructuring plan. The consultant's report was submitted to the Commission on 16 July 1998.

(55) It emerges from the report that the revised plan of OA is realistic and should allow OA to restore viability in the medium term.

(56) OA is expected to return to profitability in 1998, even though the company faced GRD 15 billion of extraordinary costs due to operational disruptions in March to April 1998. Net profits (after tax) will then rise to GRD 20,9 billion in 1999, thus reaching very satisfactory levels. Because of a substantial increase of financial expenses to be incurred by the fleet renewal programme and the decrease of ground-handling revenue consecutive to the termination of the OA monopoly, net profit (after tax) will then decrease and stabilise at GRD 3,9 billion at the end of the plan in 2002.

(57) The expected decrease in net results from 2000 implies that in order to maintain viability beyond that date, OA will have to:

- effectively sustain costs at a lower level, in particular labour costs, while maintaining the current level of activity throughout the duration of the plan and beyond. In this regard, the report of the consultant stressed that an improved management information system is required, so that the management of OA constantly receives timely analysis of total operating cost and revenues enabling it to adapt the revised plan by providing for additional measures if needed. These additional measures would have to counteract any shortfall in revenues and further reduce labour costs,

- ensure that the compensation to be granted by Greece for the loss of investment at Hellenikon airport will actually be available in time for the projected investments to be carried out at Spata airport. Otherwise, the company could be exposed to larger cash requirements.

(58) In the light of the factual information summarised above, the Commission is in a position to make a final assessment in this case.

LEGAL ASSESSMENT

VII

(59) Under the terms of Article 92(1) of the Treaty and Article 61(2) of the EEA Agreement, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods is incompatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement.

(60) In this case, it is important to assess, in the light of those provisions:

(a) The aid measures granted and to be granted by Greece to OA, initially authorised by its Decision of 7 October 1994, and for which the Commission decided on 30 April 1996 to open the procedure provided for in Article 93(2) of the Treaty. These aid measures comprise:

(i) loan guarantees extended to the company until 7 October 1994 pursuant to Article 6 of Greek Law No 96/75;

(ii) new loan guarantees totalling USD 378 million for loans to be contracted before 31 December 1997 for the purchase of new aircraft;

(iii) easing of the undertaking's debt burden by GRD 427 billion;

(iv) conversion of GRD 64 billion of the undertaking's debt to equity;

(v) a capital injection of GRD 54 billion in three instalments of GRD 19, 23 and 12 billion in 1995, 1996 and 1997 respectively.

(b) The new non-notified aid measures granted by Greece to OA for which the Commission also decided on 30 April 1996 to open the procedure provided for in Article 93(2) of the Treaty as well as the additional non-notified aid measure were identified by the Commission in the course of this procedure. These measures comprise:

(i) the payment by the State of the purchase cost for military service and the year of previous service and of the redundancy indemnities paid to the employees accepting early retirement up to an amount of GRD 11 billion as provided pursuant to Article 2(12)(a) of Law No 2271/94

(ii) the tax exemptions for the period 1995 to 1997 and for loan guarantees as well as the exemption from non-fiscal expenses likely to affect capital injections as likely to be involved by Article 1(1) and (i) of Law No 2271/94

(iii) the apparent continuation, beyond the date of notification of the initial Decision to Greece, of the exemption of OA from the payment of landing and parking charges at Greek airports

(iv) the preferential tax treatment of the redundancy indemnity granted to OA employees accepting early retirement, as provided by Article 2(4) of Law No 2271/94.

VIII

(61) With regard to those aid measures initially authorised for which the Commission decided to open the procedure, the Commission considers that there is no doubt that they constitute State aid and that they affect trade between Member States and also distort competition within the common market. In this regard, the Commission refers to its assessment set out in the initial Decision.

(62) The Commission considers that the derogations provided by Article 92(2) of the Treaty and Article 61(2) of the EEA Agreement as well as Article 92(3)(a) and (b) of the Treaty and Article 61(3)(a) and (b) of the EEA Agreement do not apply in the case at hand. In this regard, the Commission refers to its assessment as set out in the initial Decision. The Commission also considers that the derogation provided by Article 92(3)(c) in respect of aid intended to promote or facilitate the development of certain areas does not apply either in the case at hand. In this regard, the Commission refers to its assessment in the initial Decision.

(63) With regard to the derogation provided by Article 92(3)(c) of the Treaty in respect of aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest, the Commission also refers to the initial Decision whereby it examined whether the criteria which allows it to consider that an aid for the restructuring of a company may be considered as compatible with the common market are met. By that Decision, the Commission considered that the compatibility of the aid with the common market was subject to the respect by Greece of 21 commitments set out in Article 1 of that same Decision. Taking into account the breach by Greece of several of these commitments as well as all the relevant additional issues pertaining to this case, the Commission has re-examined the compatibility of this aid with the common market.

(64) For this purpose, the Commission has verified whether all the commitments of the initial Decision are now being adhered to by Greece and whether the situation as to self-handling at Greek airports reflects the assurances given by the Greek authorities in the initial Decision.

(65) Turning to the commitments for which the Commission identified breaches by Greece in its decision to open the procedure (Article 1(b), (c), (d), (e), (o) of the initial Decision of 7 October 1994) and in the course of the subsequent procedure (Article 1(r) of the initial Decision of 7 October 1994), the Commission, on the basis of the information and assurances given by the Greek authorities, notably by letters of 28 May, 3 and 6 July 1998, considers that all the issues involved by the respect of these commitments are resolved (issues 1 to 18).

(66) With regard in particular to:

(a) The cumbersome administrative procedure set out by Articles 1 to 24 of Law No 2190/94 (issue 3). The Commission considers that the application of this procedure to permanent staff is not unsuited to flexible personnel management as needs for such personnel are usually planned in advance. Conversely, the new derogating procedure which now applies to seasonal staff provides for the required flexibility, while allowing for transparency at the same time.

(b) The conditions for transport of press publications (issue 8). Taking into account the assurances given by Greece, the Commission has verified that the new tariffs are set by OA in accordance with a normal commercial policy and allow the company to cover its costs for this activity (the new tariffs will result in an increase of the corresponding yields from GRD 25/TKT to GRD 408/TKT and break-even load factor will decrease from 110 % to 35,2 %).

(c) The settlement of the respective debts of OA and the Greek State (issue 9). the Commission considers that the payment of all Greek State debts to OA is now ensured within a reasonable time frame.

(d) The aids involved in the GRD 11 billion provided by Article 2(12)(a) of Law No 2271/94 (issue 14) and by the GRD 2,2 billion resulting from the preferential tax treatment of redundancy indemnities as provided by Article 2(4) of Law No 2271/94 (issue 16a). The Commission considers that these measures constitute State aid to OA incompatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the Treaty. However, given the fact that, on the one hand, Greece has unilaterally decided to reduce the amount of the remaining capital increase to be carried out for an amount equal to the nominal amount involved by this aid and that, on the other hand, OA has not benefited from the remaining amount of the capital increase, as the corresponding instalments scheduled for January 1996 and January 1997 have not yet taken place, the Commission considers that the corresponding financial benefit for OA (principal and interest) will be neutralised. On this basis, this aid will have had no effect on competition.

(e) The aid involved by Article 1(j)(b) and (i) of Law No 2271/94 (issue 15). The Commission considers that since Greece has confirmed to the Commission that the tax exemption provided for in Article 1(j)(b) and (i) is limited to those exemptions authorised by Article 1(c) of the initial Decision, these provisions do not involve any element of aid to OA.

(f) The aid involved by the apparent continuation beyond the date of notification of the initial Decision to Greece of the exemption of OA from the payment of landing and parking charges at Greek airports (issue 16). The Commission considers that since a compensation between, on the one hand, the unpaid landing and parking charges at Greek airports by OA to the Greek Civil Aviation Authority and, on the other hand, the debts of the Greek Civil Aviation Authority to OA has taken place and since Greece has confirmed that OA will repay the outstanding amount to the Greek Civil Aviation Authority estimated at GRD 1,29 billion (interest included) by 31 December 1998, this issue does not involve any element of aid to OA.

(67) As to the other commitments for which no breach by Greece was identified by the initial Decision (Article 1(a), (f) to (n), (p), (q), (s) to (u)), the information available to the Commission demonstrates that Greece has not failed to comply with these commitments.

(68) Consequently, the Commission considers that all the commitments set out in the initial Decision are now fully complied with by Greece.

(69) As to self-handling at Greek airports, the Commission, having taken into account the amendment of the Regulation on the procedure for the granting of licences for self-handling, the information transmitted by Greece on the applications lodged by Community carriers, and the assurances given by the Greek authorities in their letter of 3 July 1998, considers that all aspects of self-handling are effectively authorised at Greek airports in accordance with the assurances given in the initial Decision and that this issue is now resolved (issue 19).

(70) However, the Commission considers that the fact that Greece now fully observes all the commitments does not suffice to secure the compatibility of the aid with the common market. Hence, it is also necessary to assess the effect on the common interest of the past failure of Greece to adhere to some of these commitments.

(71) The fact that the State has continued to interfere in the management of OA beyond the strict limits of its role as a shareholder has not resulted in a transfer of OA's problems to its competitors. In addition, this behaviour has not yielded any kind of benefit to OA. On the contrary, it has had a negative impact on specific aspects of the restructuring process of the company. The same applies to the fact that the State has not given to OA the fiscal status of a public limited company comparable to that of Greek companies under ordinary law.

(72) The fact that OA has been granted unauthorised aids for a total amount of GRD 13,2 billion could have distorted competition. However, the cumulative effect of the fact that the remaining amount of capital injection has still not been carried out to date and the fact that it will be reduced by the same amount neutralises any distorting effect of that aid on competition.

(73) The fact that the Presidential Decree terminating the preferential and exclusive rights of OA to operate mainland domestic services did not enter into force before 31 December 1994 has not had any effect in practice on competitive conditions, since all the mainland domestic routes were already open to competition.

(74) The fact that the Presidential Decree terminating OA's exclusive right to operate scheduled international services to non-EEA countries has not entered into force in a reasonable time does not appear to have had any effect in practice on competitive conditions since the Commission has not been informed of any refusal by the Greek authorities to grant traffic rights for the operation of such services.

(75) The fact that some constraints for the operation of non-scheduled flights to Greece have remained after the adoption of the initial Decision is likely to have had some effects on competitive conditions. However, given that these constraints concerned only operations to the Greek islands and concerned only specific aspects of air transport, their effect on competitive conditions has been limited. The Commission considers in any case that these limited effects are offset by the fact that OA has not received the remaining amount of capital injection and has not been able to use the State guarantees.

(76) On the basis of the above, the Commission considers that the past failure of Greece to observe some of the commitments had no effect on the common interest or had limited effects which have largely been offset by the negative consequences of the opening of the procedure for OA.

(77) In addition, the Commission has verified whether the aid still forms part of a comprehensive restructuring programme aimed at improving the financial health of OA so that it can, within a reasonable period, become viable and competitive in the environment in which it is operating.

(78) In this regard, the Commission notes that the Greek Government submitted on 6 July 1998 a revised restructuring programme covering the period 1998 to 2002, and thus extending the period of the restructuring beyond the term provided by the initial plan (1997). An updating of the initial plan and an extension of the restructuring period were necessary to allow OA to redress the situation with regard to the achievement of the objectives provided by the initial plan.

(79) The revised plan does not provide for any aid measures other than those which have been authorised by the initial Decision and which have not yet been granted to OA. These include a GRD 35 billion captial increase and the State guarantees totalling USD 378 million initially scheduled to be used for loans contracted before 31 December 1997. However, as indicated by Greece in its letter of 6 July 1998, the plan only provides for a capital increase of GRD 21,8 billion in order to take into account the new non-authorisied aids granted to OA on the basis of Law No 2271/94. In addition, with regard to the State guarantees, the plan provides that the State guarantees will be used for loans to be contracted before 31 December 2000.

(80) The revised restructuring plan redefines and intensifies the efforts to be made by OA in terms of cost control and productivity. It is based on new working conditions which already apply and will allow OA to reduce labour costs and improve personnel productivity. Hence, labour cost productivity is expected to increase by 16 % between 1998 and 2002. Yields, which are presently very low, will increase through rising fares, network restructuring, implementation of a yield management system and improvement of the product. The plan provides for intensive fleet utilisation while fleet growth will remain limited to four additional aircraft over the duration of the plan. However, as the fleet renewal programme will bring in smaller aircraft than those presently used, the growth in capacity offered by OA in the EEA (+ 12 % in available seat-kilometres) will not exceed the average market growth (20 to 22,5 %)(7).

(81) As a result of the above, OA is expected to return to profitability as early as 1998. By increasing revenues and reducing costs, the plan will allow OA to maintain profitability throughout its duration and cope with the large investments required by the fleet renewal programme and the move to Spata airport.

(82) While the acquisition of new aircraft (GRD 311 billion) will be financed by a mix of cash reserves, long-term loans and contracted with commercial banks and operating leases, the move to Spata will be financed by cash flow reserves (GRD 40 billion) and by a compensation to be granted by the State for the loss of investments at Hellenikon airport as a result of the closure of that airport estimated at GRD 35 billion). With regard to this compensation, Greece has confirmed to the Commission by letter of 3 July 1998 that the compensation will not involve any element of aid to OA as it will be granted on the basis of Greek common law and that the amount to be granted will strictly correspond to that which any company in a similar position would be entitled to receive. In addition, in order to allay the doubts of the Commission with regard to the timing of this compensation, Greece has also reasssured the Commission that on the basis of the agreement to be reached between OA and the Greek State, the compensation will be paid so as to coincide with the company's expenditures incurred by its move to Spata airport.

(83) In view of the investments totalling GRD 346 billion which are necessary for the future viability of the company in the case of the fleet renewal and mandatory in the case of the move to Spata airport, as Hellenikon airport will be closed in 2001, the Commission considers that, taking into account the new unauthorised aid granted to OA for an amount of GRD 13,2 billion, both the capital injection of 21,8 billion and the State guarantees for USD 378 million (or GRD 120 billion) are necessary to keep financial costs at a sustainable level throughout the period of the plan. During the period of the revised plan, the debt-equity ratio will remain higher than the typical industry average (it will reach 2,34 in 2002). However, this is in line with the important amount of investments which OA should be able to sustain as yields and revenue will substantially increase (turnover from GRD 324294 billion in 1998 to GRD 380626 billion in 2002).

(84) On this basis, given the reasonable level of the expected profits and the evolution of debt-equity ratio, the Commission considers that the level of aid approved by the initial Decision is sufficient and not excessive.

(85) With regard to the effective implementation of the revised plan, the Commission is reassured by the existence of a detailed implementation plan which supplements the revised plan. This implementation plan, by setting out the timing of the various measures, implementation costs and the timing and amounts of the planned benefits, reinforces the credibilty of the revised plan. The Commission however notes that the management information system currently in place at OA does not allow the management of the company to constantly receive adequate information which would enable it to follow the results of the implementation and further adapt the revised plan if necessary. Therefore, the Commission intends to control on the basis of a detailed report to be submitted by Greece in this regard by 1 December at the latest, whether a fully operational and adequate management information system is effectively available to the management of OA.

(86) On the basis of the above, the Commission considers that the revised plan constitutes adequate framework in order to allow OA to become viable by the year 2000 and sustain viability beyond that date.

(87) Finally, the Commission recalls the existence of the 21 commitments given by Greece in the framework of the initial Decision which, as mentioned above, are now fully complied with. These commitments remain fully applicable during the period covered by the revised restructuring plan, namely until 31 December 2002, and are necessary in order to secure the compatibility of the aid with the common market within the meaning of Article 92(3)(c) of the Treaty.

(88) However, in order to take into account the fact that the restructuring plan has been revised and extended beyond 1997 and the fact that this plan should allow OA to reach viability by the year 2000, the Commission considers that the effectiveness of the compatibility of the aid with the common market requires that the conditions resulting from the commitments are updated and precise. For this purpose:

(a) the payment of the second instalment of GRD 7,8 billion will be subject to compliance with all the conditions imposed in order to secure the compatibility of the aid with the common market and the actual implementation of the revised restructuring plan and achievement of the expected results (in particular as regards the cost and productivity ratios set out in Part VI). The instalment will not be released if the conditions are not fulfilled and/or the objectives of the revised restructuring plan are not met;

(b) at least 10 weeks before the release of the second instalment planned for 15 June 1999 and by the end of the months of October 1999, March 2000 and October 2000, Greece will be required to submit a report to the Commission on the respect of all the conditions imposed to secure the compatibility of the aid and the implementation of the revised restructuring plan and achievement of the planned results (in particular as regards the cost and productivity ratios set out in Part VI);

(c) Greece will be required to continue to ensure that OA does not act as price leader on the scheduled routes Athens-Stockholm and Athens-London during the period covered by the revised restructuring plan. There is no need to expand the scope of this obligation to other air routes operated by OA than those expressly mentioned under Article 1(p) of the initial Decision, since the Commission has not received any substantiated evidence that the fares offered by OA on other routes raise competitive concerns. With regard to the Athens-Stockholm and Athens-London routes, the Commission notes that the commitment given under Article 1(p) has been fully observed;

(d) Greece will be required to continue to ensure that during the period covered by the revised restructuring plan, the number of seats offered by OA on scheduled flights in the EEA, inlcuding additional and seasonal flights and including services between continental Greece and the Greek islands, will not exceed that offered by OA in the EEA market in 1997 (7792243 seats), taking into account however, a possible increase proportional to the growth of the market in question. The scope of this obligation is expanded as compared to Article 1(s) of the initial Decision in order to include the capacity offered by OA on domestic services to the Greek islands, thus reflecting the fact that airports in the Greek islands are no longer exempted from the application of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92. There is no need to expand further the scope of this obligation to services to non-EEA countries since the competitive position of OA on these routes with regard to that of other Community carriers does not raise any problem. The number of routes operated by OA to non-EEA countries is limited as well as the offer of OA on these routes. Moreover, OA intends to discontinue the operation of some services (Boston, Montreal, Toronto and Nairobi).

(89) Additionally, the Commission expressly confirms that the State guarantees totalling USD 378 million for loans to be contracted before 31 December 2000 can be used either for the purchase of aircraft or the leasing of aircraft as this was the intention of the initial Decision.

(90) With regard to the new non-notified aid measures on account of which the Commission decided to open the procedure as well as the additional non-notified aid measure identified in the course of this procedure, the Commission refers to the assessment made under Part VIII with regard to the respect by Greece of the commitment not to grant any further aid to OA in any form whatsoever (issues 14, 15,16 and 16a).

(91) On this basis, the Commission considers that the illegal aids involved by Articles 2(12)(a) and Article 4 of Law No 2271/94 are incompatible with the common market. However, since the effects of these aids on competition will be neutralised, the Commission considers that Greece should not be requested to recover these aids. Additionally, the Commission considers that the provisions of Article 1(b) and (i) of Law No 2271/94 and the issue of unpaid landing and parking fees by OA at Greek airports do not involve any element of aid to OA.

(92) The considerations set out in Parts VIII and IX address the concerns expressed by the Commission in its Decision of 30 April 1996 to open the procedure and by Member States and interested third parties in the comments they have subsequently produced.

(93) In the light of the foregoing, the Commission considers that:

(a) the aid granted and to be granted to OA by Greece in the form of:

(i) loan guarantees extended to the company until 7 October 1994 pursuant to Article 6 of Greek Law No 96/75;

(ii) new loan guarantees totalling USD 378 million for loans to be contracted before 31 December 2000 for the purchase of new aircraft;

(iii) easing of the undertaking's debt burden by GRD 427 billion;

(iv) conversion of GRD 64 billion of the undertaking's debt to equity;

(v) a capital injection of GRD 54 billion reduced to GRD 40,8 billion in three instalments of respectively GRD 19, 14 and 7,8 billion in 1995, 1998 and 1999 respectively

may benefit from the derogation provided for in Article 92(3)(c) of the Treaty and Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement provided that the conditions set out by the initial Decision pursuant to Article 1(a) to (u) are met as well as a number of other conditions so as to ensure that the aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest;

(b) the illegal aids granted to OA by Greece in accordance with Article 2(12)(a) and (4) of Law No 2271/94 are incompatible with the common market. Greece is not required to order the recovery of these aids,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1. The restructuring aid granted, and to be granted, by Greece to Olympic Airways in the form of:

(i) loan guarantees extended to the company until 7 October 1994 pursuant to Article 6 of Greek Law No 96/75;

(ii) new loan guarantees totalling USD 378 million for loans to be contracted before 31 December 2000 for the purchase of new aircraft;

(iii) easing of the undertaking's debt burden by GRD 427 billion;

(iv) conversion of GRD 64 billion of the undertaking's debt to equity;

(v) a capital injection of GRD 54 billion reduced to GRD 40,8 billion in three instalments of respectively GRD 19, 14 and 7,8 billion in 1995, 1998 and 1999 respectively

is deemed to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement pursuant to Article 92(3)(c) of the Treaty and Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement provided that:

(a) Greece fulfils the undertakings referred to in Article 1(a) to (u) of the Commission Decision of 7 October 1994 on the aid granted by Greece to Olympic Airways;

(b) Greece ensures that OA does not act as price leader on the scheduled Athens-Stockholm and Athens-London routes during the period 1998 to 2002 inclusive;

(c) Greece ensures that until 2002 inclusive, the number of seats offered by OA on scheduled flights in the EEA, including additional and seasonal flights and including services between continental Greece and the Greek islands, will not exceed that offered by OA in the EEA market in 1997 (7792243 seats), taking into account, however, a possible increase proportional to the growth of the market in question;

(d) Greece ensures that by 1 December 1998, OA will have implemented a fully operational and adequate management information system. Greece shall submit by 1 December 1998 a report to the Commission on this matter.

2. The payment of the second instalment of GRD 7,8 billion shall be subject to compliance with all the conditions imposed in order to secure the compatibility of the aid with the common market and the actual implementation of the revised restructuring plan and achievement of the expected results (in particular as regards the cost and productivity ratios set out in Part VI).

At least 10 weeks before the release of the second instalment planned for 15 June 1999 and by the end of the months of October 1999, March 2000 and October 2000, Greece shall submit a report to the Commission on the fulfilment of all the conditions imposed to secure the compatibility of the aid and the implementation of the revised restructuring plan and achievement of the planned results (in particular as regards the cost and productivity ratios set out in Part VI). The second instalment shall not be released if the conditions are not complied with and/or the objectives of the revised restructuring plan are not met.

Article 2

The illegal aids granted to OA by Greece in accordance with Article 2(12)(a) and Article 4 of Law No 2271/94 are incompatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement by virtue of Article 92(1) of the Treaty and Article 62(1) of the EEA Agreement.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.

Done at Brussels, 14 August 1998.

For the Commission

Karel VAN MIERT

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ C 176, 19.6.1996, p. 5.

(2) OJ L 273, 25.10.1994, p. 22.

(3) OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p.8.

(4) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92; Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92 on fares and rates for air services (OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 15).

(5) See footnote 1, page 1.

(6) OJ L 272, 25.10.1996, p. 36.

(7) Based on AEA estimates