COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2022/765
of 13 April 2022
on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the draft performance plan submitted by Finland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
(notified under document C(2022) 2285)
(Only the Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Text with EEA relevance)
Finland |
Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
||||
Air navigation service provider concerned |
Safety management objective |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
ANS Finland |
Safety policy and objectives |
C |
C |
C |
C |
Safety risk management |
C |
C |
C |
D |
|
Safety assurance |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
Safety promotion |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
Safety culture |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
Draft en route environment targets of Finland, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
Reference values for Finland |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
|
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
Draft en route capacity targets of Finland, in minutes of ATFM delay per flight |
0,03 |
0,05 |
0,05 |
0,05 |
Reference values for Finland |
0,03 |
0,05 |
0,05 |
0,05 |
En route charging zone of Finland |
2014 baseline value |
2019 baseline value |
2020 -2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
Draft en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms at 2017 prices) |
55,87 EUR |
40,70 EUR |
81,42 EUR |
48,63 EUR |
41,43 EUR |
40,22 EUR |
Article 1
Article 2
ANNEX
Performance targets included in the draft performance plan submitted by Finland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY
Effectiveness of safety management
Finland |
Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
||||
Air navigation service provider concerned |
Safety management objective |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
ANS Finland |
Safety policy and objectives |
C |
C |
C |
C |
Safety risk management |
C |
C |
C |
D |
|
Safety assurance |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
Safety promotion |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
Safety culture |
C |
C |
C |
C |
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT
Average horizontal
en route
flight efficiency of the actual trajectory
|
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
Draft en route environment targets of Finland, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
Reference values for Finland |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
0,88 % |
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY
Average
en route
ATFM delay in minutes per flight
|
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
Draft en route capacity targets of Finland, in minutes of ATFM delay per flight |
0,03 |
0,05 |
0,05 |
0,05 |
Reference values for Finland |
0,03 |
0,05 |
0,05 |
0,05 |
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY
Determined unit cost for
en route
air navigation services
En route charging zone of Finland |
2014 baseline value |
2019 baseline value |
2020 -2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
Draft en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms at 2017 prices) |
55,87 EUR |
40,70 EUR |
81,42 EUR |
48,63 EUR |
41,43 EUR |
40,22 EUR |