98/512/EC: Commission Decision of 29 July 1998 recognising in principle the compl... (31998D0512)
EU - Rechtsakte: 03 Agriculture

31998D0512

98/512/EC: Commission Decision of 29 July 1998 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossiers submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of BAS 620H (tepraloxydim), S-metolachlor and SZX 0722 (iprovalicarb) in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant-protection products on the market (notified under document number C(1998) 2368) (Text with EEA relevance)

Official Journal L 228 , 15/08/1998 P. 0035 - 0036
COMMISSION DECISION of 29 July 1998 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossiers submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of BAS 620H (tepraloxydim), S-metolachlor and SZX 0722 (iprovalicarb) in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant-protection products on the market (notified under document number C(1998) 2368) (Text with EEA relevance) (98/512/EC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant-protection products on the market (1) as last amended by Commission Directive 98/47/EC (2) and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,
Whereas Directive 91/414/EEC (hereinafter 'the Directive`) has provided for the development of a Community list of active substances authorised for incorporation in plant protection products;
Whereas applicants have submitted dossiers for three active substances to Member States' authorities in view of obtaining the inclusion of the active substances in Annex I to the Directive;
Whereas a dossier for the active substance BAS 620H (tepraloxydim) was submitted by BASF AG to the Spanish authorities on 11 September 1997;
Whereas a dossier for the active substance S-metolachlor was submitted by SA Novartis Agro NV to the Belgian authorities on 1 August 1997;
Whereas a dossier for the active substance SZX 0722 (inprovalicarb) was submitted by Bayer AG to the Irish authorities on 30 March 1998;
Whereas the said authorities indicated to the Commission the results of a first examination of the completeness of the dossier with regard to the data and information requirements provided for in Annex II and, for at least one plant protection product containing the active substance concerned, in Annex III to the Directive; whereas subsequently, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2), the dossiers were submitted by the applicants to the Commission and other Member States;
Whereas the dossiers for BAS 620H (tepraloxydim), S-metolachlor and SZX 0722 (iprovalicarb) were referred to the Standing Committee on Plant Health on 21 April 1998;
Whereas Article 6(3) of the Directive requires it being confirmed at the level of the Community that each dossier is to be considered as satisfying in principle the data and information requirements provided for in Annex II and, for at least one plant protection product containing the active substance concerned, in Annex III to the Directive;
Whereas such confirmation is necessary in order to pursue the detailed examination of the dossier as well as in order to open to Member States the possibility of granting provisional authorisation for plant protection containing this active substance in due respect of the conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of the Directive, and in particular the condition to make a detailed assessment of the active substances and the plant protection products with regard to the requirements of the Directive;
Whereas such Decision does not prejudice that further data or information may be requested from the applicant where it would appear during the detailed examination that such information or data are required for a Decision to be taken;
Whereas it is understood between the Member States and the Commission that Spain will pursue the detailed examination for the dossier for BAS 620H (tepraloxydim), that Belgium will pursue the detailed examination for the dossier for S-metolachlor and that Ireland will pursue the detailed examination for the dossier for SZX 0722 (iprovalicarb);
Whereas Spain, Belgium and Ireland will report the conclusions of their examinations accompanied by any recommendations on the inclusion or non-inclusion and any conditions related thereto to the Commission as soon as possible and at the latest within a period of one year, whereas on receipt of this report the detailed examination will be continued with the expertise from all Member States within the framework of the Standing Committee on Plant Health;
Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The following dossiers satisfy in principle the data and information requirements provided for in Annex II and, for at least one plant protection product containing the active substance concerned, in Annex III to the Directive, taking into account the uses proposed:
1. The dossier submitted by BASF AG to the Commission and the Member States with a view to the inclusion of BAS 620H (tepraloxydim) as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and which was referred to the Standing Committee on Plant Health on 21 April 1998.
2. The dossier submitted by SA Novartis Agro NV to the Commission and the Member States with a view to the inclusion of S-metolachlor as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and which was referred to the Standing Committee on Plant Health on 21 April 1998.
3. The dossier submitted by Bayer AG to the Commission and the Member States with a view to the inclusion of SZX 0722 (iprovalicarb) as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and which was referred to the Standing Committee on Plant Health on 21 April 1998.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 July 1998.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 230, 19. 8. 1991, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 191, 7. 7. 1998, p. 50.
Markierungen
Leseansicht