31996D0564

96/564/EC, Euratom: Commission Decision of 11 September 1996 authorizing Austria not to take into account certain categories of transactions and to use certain approximate estimates for the calculation of the VAT own resources base (Only the German text is authentic)

Official Journal L 247 , 28/09/1996 P. 0039 - 0040

COMMISSION DECISION of 11 September 1996 authorizing Austria not to take into account certain categories of transactions and to use certain approximate estimates for the calculation of the VAT own resources base (Only the German text is authentic) (96/564/Euratom, EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value-added tax (1), and in particular Article 13 thereof,

Whereas, under Article 28 (3) of the Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value-added tax: uniform basis of assessment (2), hereinafter called 'the sixth Directive`, the Member States may continue to exempt or tax certain transactions; whereas these transactions must be taken into account for the determination of the VAT resources base;

Whereas, for the application of the provisions in Article 28 (3) of the sixth Directive, paragraph 2 (h) and (i) of Annex IX (Taxation) to the Act of Accession of the Republic of Austria to the European Communities (3), authorizes Austria to exempt or to tax certain transactions listed in Annex E and F to the sixth Directive;

Whereas Austria is unable to make a precise calculation of the VAT own resources base for the category of transactions listed in Annex F, point 7 to the sixth Directive; whereas such calculation is likely to involve an unjustified administrative burden in relation to the minimal effect of these transactions on Austria's total VAT resources base; whereas Austria should therefore be authorized not to take these transactions into account for the calculation of the VAT base;

Whereas Austria is able to make a calculation using approximate estimates for three categories of transactions listed in Annexes E and F to the sixth Directive; whereas Austria should therefore be authorized to calculate the VAT base using approximate estimates;

Whereas the Advisory Committee on Own Resources has approved the report recording the opinions of its members on this Decision,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the purpose of calculating the VAT own resources base from 1 January 1995, Austria is authorized, in accordance with the first indent of Article 6 (3) of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89, not to take into account the following category of transactions referred to in Annex F to the sixth Directive:

- transactions carried out by blind persons or workshops for the blind provided these exemptions do not give rise to significant distortion of competition (Annex F, former point 7).

Article 2

For the purpose of calculating the VAT own resources base from 1 January 1995, Austria is authorized to use approximate estimates in respect of the following categories of transactions referred to in Annexes E and F to the sixth Directive:

1. services supplied by dental technicians in their professional capacity and dental prostheses supplied by dentist and dental technicians to Austrian social security institutions, (Annex E, former point 2);

2. telecommunication services supplied by public postal services, (Annex F, former point 5);

3. supplies of buildings and land described in Article 4 (3) of the sixth Directive (Annex F, former point 16).

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Austria.

Done at Brussels, 11 September 1996.

For the Commission

Erkki LIIKANEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 155, 7. 6. 1989, p. 9.

(2) OJ No L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1.

(3) OJ No C 241, 29. 8. 1994, p. 336.